This framework has a significant difference from the Diffusion Model. The former emphasise on non-linear change of innovation, however the latter is only focused on speed up the spread of innovation. In my opinion, the framework Clarke & Dede (2009)proposed is more practical for innovation could be more robust and sustainable.
The Depth dimension refers to an interactive cycle: Design->Implement->Refine theories of learning-> Redesign. I believe the development of learning theories goes through this process, from Behaviourism to Cognitivism to Constructivism,etc.
From my internship experience, I have a strong agreement of the importance of Shift dimension in the framework. When the teachers are no longer negative users and have ownership and power to change in the innovation, they really implement the innovation heart and soul. Otherwise, they just listen to the order of the principles and don't have the motivation to make it better.
Kampylis, Bocconi & Punie (2012) established a framework to define ICT-enabled innovation for learning. It's a useful framework to assess the innovation and have a clear idea about the strengths and weakness of current situation in the education system.
The Depth dimension refers to an interactive cycle: Design->Implement->Refine theories of learning-> Redesign. I believe the development of learning theories goes through this process, from Behaviourism to Cognitivism to Constructivism,etc.
From my internship experience, I have a strong agreement of the importance of Shift dimension in the framework. When the teachers are no longer negative users and have ownership and power to change in the innovation, they really implement the innovation heart and soul. Otherwise, they just listen to the order of the principles and don't have the motivation to make it better.
Kampylis, Bocconi & Punie (2012) established a framework to define ICT-enabled innovation for learning. It's a useful framework to assess the innovation and have a clear idea about the strengths and weakness of current situation in the education system.
References:
- Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for Scalability: A Case Study of the River City Curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353–365. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9156
- Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing School Leadership and Management from a Distributed Perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253–281